Running · 6 min read

Marathon Fuelling: How Much Carbohydrate Do Runners Need?

Carbohydrate taken during a marathon supplies fuel while the body’s stored carbohydrate is being used. For many runners, 60–90 g per hour is a useful range to develop towards in training, with the final amount determined by race intensity, duration and gastrointestinal tolerance. Understanding the physiology helps turn that range into a plan that can be followed for the whole race.

By Chris Gkoufas ·

Coach observing a runner during a treadmill session at DVOTION
Running assessment and coaching at DVOTION in London.

Glycogen and the energy demands of a marathon

Carbohydrate is stored as glycogen in skeletal muscle and the liver. Muscle glycogen supplies fuel within the working muscle, while liver glycogen helps support blood glucose. Running also uses fat, with the relative contribution of carbohydrate generally increasing as exercise intensity rises. These fuels support the continual regeneration of ATP required for muscular contraction. Hargreaves and Spriet, 2020

During prolonged exercise, the availability of carbohydrate becomes an important constraint on maintaining intensity. Taking carbohydrate during the race helps maintain blood glucose and carbohydrate oxidation, meaning its use as fuel, and can improve endurance performance. Jeukendrup, 2014

This is the physiological reason to begin fuelling before a pronounced loss of energy develops. A gel taken after pace has collapsed cannot retrospectively supply the preceding hour. We recommend distributing intake from early in the race, using a schedule already practised during longer runs.

The hourly intake is also different from total energy expenditure. Runners do not need to replace every calorie used while running. Carbohydrate consumed during the event contributes alongside fuel already stored in the body; the practical aim is to support the required effort with an amount that can be absorbed and tolerated.

Choosing an hourly carbohydrate intake

Established guidance recommends 30–60 g/hour for exercise lasting around 1–2.5 hours and up to approximately 90 g/hour for longer endurance events. Higher intakes should use multiple transportable carbohydrates, usually a glucose source combined with fructose. Thomas et al., 2016

For a marathon, duration alone does not settle the amount. A runner completing five hours at a relatively low absolute intensity may use carbohydrate at a different rate from a faster runner racing hard for three hours. Tolerance also varies. We use the 60–90 g/hour range as a practical starting point for planning many marathon efforts, then develop the intake through training rather than imposing the upper end on every runner.

Someone comfortable with 40 g/hour should work progressively towards the intended race intake. Moving directly to 90 g/hour on race morning adds an untested demand at the point when there is least room to resolve it. A lower amount that has been tolerated reliably is preferable to repeatedly forcing an intake that causes substantial symptoms.

These during-exercise recommendations are usually expressed in grams per hour, rather than grams per kilogram of body mass. Intestinal delivery is an important limit on the use of ingested carbohydrate, so a larger runner does not automatically need a proportionately larger hourly dose. Jeukendrup, 2014

Glucose, fructose and absorption

Before ingested carbohydrate can be used by working muscle, it has to move through the digestive system and into the circulation. Glucose and fructose use different intestinal transport pathways. Combining them allows a higher rate of carbohydrate delivery and oxidation than relying on glucose alone at high intakes. Maltodextrin, a common gel ingredient, is broken down into glucose and uses that glucose pathway. Jeukendrup, 2014

The practical consequence is to look at the carbohydrate blend when planning higher intakes. Packet count alone says little: two products described as gels can contain different carbohydrate amounts and different mixtures. The nutrition label and instructions for use are more informative than the size of the packet.

Fluid matters too. Some concentrated gels are designed to be taken with water, while other products have different instructions. Rehearse the intended combination of gel and drink, because that is the combination the stomach will encounter during the race. A product tolerated on its own may feel different when combined with a carbohydrate drink and a pre-race breakfast.

Turning grams into gels and drinks

Start with the carbohydrate target, subtract the contribution from any drink, and supply the remainder through gels or another familiar source. The examples below show the arithmetic for one hour. They assume that the stated drink quantity is already appropriate for the runner’s fluid needs.

Illustrative carbohydrate combinations for one hour
Hourly totalExample intake
60 gThree gels containing 20 g each
60 gTwo gels containing 30 g each
60 g30 g from a drink plus one 30 g gel
90 gThree gels containing 30 g each

Planning a four-hour marathon

At 60 g/hour, a four-hour race requires 240 g of carbohydrate during the event. If each gel contains 30 g and the drinks contain no carbohydrate, that total is eight gels. One gel every 30 minutes, beginning at roughly 15 minutes, spreads the intake across the race: 15, 45, 75, 105, 135, 165, 195 and 225 minutes.

The same calculation can be adapted for a different product. If a drink provides 30 g each hour, one 30 g gel each hour brings the total to 60 g. The drink’s contribution should be based on the amount consumed, rather than the carbohydrate in a full bottle that may not be finished.

Race logistics determine whether the calculation is usable. Check where water is available, how products will be carried and whether aid-station drinks match those used in training. A spare gel is useful if one is dropped or the race takes longer than expected. Avoid trying to recover a missed dose by taking several packets together; resume a manageable schedule and assess how the stomach is responding.

Developing gastrointestinal tolerance

The gastrointestinal system can adapt to repeated feeding during exercise. Research on gut training supports practising carbohydrate intake as part of preparation, although improvements in comfort and absorption are not identical in every athlete. Jeukendrup, 2017

Use relevant long runs to develop the routine, beginning at an amount that is comfortable. Keep the breakfast, product and drink combination reasonably consistent while changing the hourly intake. This makes the result easier to interpret than changing the gel, concentration, meal and pace together.

Record the amount consumed and when symptoms appeared. Discomfort beginning after several hours requires a different review from a product that causes nausea immediately. Persistent pain, vomiting or diarrhoea warrants advice from a sports dietitian or clinician. Repeatedly forcing a poorly tolerated strategy is not useful gut training.

Intakes above 90 g/hour are receiving growing attention. A 2026 review discusses potential applications around 120 g/hour in trained athletes, while emphasising that broad recommendations for 120–200 g/hour exceed the established performance evidence. Higher carbohydrate oxidation does not itself establish a faster marathon. Morton et al., 2026 For recreational runners, developing a consistent, well-tolerated plan within conventional guidance is the more appropriate priority.

Matching fuel intake with fluid needs

Sweat losses depend on the runner and the conditions. Sweat rate and sweat sodium concentration can both vary, which limits the value of a single fixed drinking recommendation for every marathoner. Baker, 2017 Our articles on sweat rate and sweat sodium explain how these measurements inform planning.

A carbohydrate drink supplies both fluid and fuel. If obtaining the desired carbohydrate amount would require excessive drinking, use a more concentrated carbohydrate source and manage fluid separately. Drinking to thirst helps guard against overconsumption; excess fluid can produce exercise-associated hyponatraemia, and sodium intake does not make overdrinking safe. Hew-Butler et al., 2015

The finished fuelling plan should be straightforward: an hourly carbohydrate amount, familiar products, usable timings and a fluid strategy suited to the conditions. The purpose of the science is to make those choices well founded, so that on race day the runner can follow a routine already established in training.

References

  1. Hargreaves M, Spriet LL (2020). Skeletal muscle energy metabolism during exercise. Nature Metabolism 2: 817–828. doi:10.1038/s42255-020-0251-4
    Supports: Muscle energy provision, glycogen and the contribution of carbohydrate and fat during exercise.
  2. Jeukendrup A (2014). A Step Towards Personalized Sports Nutrition: Carbohydrate Intake During Exercise. Sports Medicine 44(Suppl 1): 25–33. doi:10.1007/s40279-014-0148-z
    Supports: Carbohydrate intake, intestinal transport, oxidation and the rationale for grams-per-hour recommendations.
  3. Thomas DT, Erdman KA, Burke LM (2016). American College of Sports Medicine Joint Position Statement. Nutrition and Athletic Performance. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise 48(3): 543–568. doi:10.1249/MSS.0000000000000852
    Supports: Carbohydrate intake during prolonged exercise, carbohydrate loading and pre-exercise nutrition.
  4. Jeukendrup AE (2017). Training the Gut for Athletes. Sports Medicine 47(Suppl 1): 101–110. doi:10.1007/s40279-017-0690-6
    Supports: Gastrointestinal adaptation and tolerance through repeated feeding practice.
  5. Morton JP, Fell JM, Gonzalez JT, Heariss MA, Podlogar T, Pugh JN, Wallis GA (2026). From Metabolism to Medals: Contemporary Perspectives and Revisiting Carbohydrate Guidelines for Fueling Endurance Athletes during Exercise. The Journal of Nutrition 156(5): 101442. doi:10.1016/j.tjnut.2026.101442
    Supports: Current evidence for higher carbohydrate intakes and the distinction between oxidation and performance.
  6. Baker LB (2017). Sweating rate and sweat sodium concentration in athletes: a review of methodology and intra/interindividual variability. Sports Medicine 47(Suppl 1): 111–128. doi:10.1007/s40279-017-0691-5
    Supports: Variation in sweat rate and sweat sodium concentration between athletes and conditions.
  7. Hew-Butler T, Rosner MH, Fowkes-Godek S, Dugas JP, Hoffman MD, Lewis DP, Maughan RJ, Miller KC, Montain SJ, Rehrer NJ, Roberts WO, Rogers IR, Siegel AJ, Stuempfle KJ, Winger JM, Verbalis JG (2015). Statement of the Third International Exercise-Associated Hyponatremia Consensus Development Conference, Carlsbad, California, 2015. Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine 25(4): 303–320. doi:10.1097/JSM.0000000000000221
    Supports: Excessive fluid consumption and exercise-associated hyponatraemia.

Related assessment

Endurance Performance Profiling

Related reading

All articles View assessments